There are a range of approaches that are used globally to address the basic human need for sanitation and waste disposal. The following is a non-comprehensive list of the main approaches used, ranging from the simplest to the most “sophisticated”. Ironically some of the more “sophisticated” are in fact the least ecological and highest emission options. It is time to reappraise the fundamentals of how ecosystems deal with waste and purify water and then mimic those processes to come up with a better and lower cost approach to dealing with our most fundamental human need.
Human manure direct to garden systems (used extensively in China even today)
low cost
spreads disease and parasites
odour
recycles nutrients for food production
composting toilets
nutrients can be recovered for food production
odours common
requires power for ventilation fans
insect disease vectors - particularly scuttle flies are difficult to control
parasitic worms can encyst and survive for years
needs no water for flushing
needs separate greywater treatment infrastructure
some larger systems can treat food wastes and other organic matter and paper
can require the addition of lime or organic matter/sawdust
final product must be buried for safety
wet composting/vermiculture treatment
can be configured without a tank as proposed for GOSEP
nutrients can be recovered
conventional plumbing can be used
treats all human waste and greywater
periodic but infrequent compost harvesting is required
parasitic worms can survive composting so harvested vermicompost must be buried
needs electricity for effluent pumping depending on the site slope and configuration
low or no odour due to the odour adsorption properties of humus
passive oxygenation means no electricity is required for the process to work
needs irrigation/dispersal field
septic tanks
requires a large tank
moderate cost to install
need no electricity to operate
requires periodic sludge collection infrastructure
ground and surface water contamination
odour and methane emissions
widely accepted and used as default in developed countries and developing country urban and rural areas
needs a relatively large dispersal field for effluent generated because anaerobic effluent (blackwater) is harder to treat than aerobic effluent
dispersal fields fail during prolonged rain or flooding
onsite aerobic treatment (main types only)
activated sludge
trickling filter
Rotating Biological Contactors (RBC)
sand filter
all require regular costly maintenance
sludge collection from septic pretreatment or sedimentation phase
all require electricity for pumping
capital intensive
odours from septic phase if present
conventional plumbing
most require effluent disinfection prior to dispersal
EcoSan
recovers urine separately for agriculture
can be “dry” or use flushing system
odours difficult to control
requires power for ventilation
high cost and high maintenance
cultural acceptance is problematic
grey water is not treated
chemical toilets
predominantly used for mobile or temporary application
requires addition of chemicals
waste product difficult to treat
requires dedicated collection infrastructure
odour emissions
not ecologically sustainable
incinerating toilets
high greenhouse emissions
safety considerations
lost benefit of organic matter
only viable for very cold or dry locations
not environmentally sustainable
Biogas systems
suitable for warm/ tropical environments
can be combined with animal manure and other organic waste treatment
produces a valuable cooking or power generation fuel
requires hydrogen sulphide removal to prevent corrosion and odour emissions
needs large storage bladders for biogas
costly to set up and maintain
safety precautions required
In field defecation
typically in rural areas but also common in some third world cities
disease vector if not buried immediately
public and undignified
can recycle nutrients and organic matter for food production
low cost
Night cart collection systems
formal collection of human wastes
odour both in storage and collection
requires formal collection infrastructure
disease vectors
expensive to operate
unpleasant work for collectors
requires disposal away from collection area
Open stormwater drains
odours in and around drains and vents
relies on regular rain to flush away human wastes
pollutes waterways
spreads disease
disease vectors and drinking water contamination
low cost infrastructure
high healthcare and mortality cost
Sewerage collection
formal drainage pipework
reduces odour and contamination from streets and houses
blockages and overflows common if not designed well
introduces the need for flushing toilet systems
squat flush toilets
flush pedestal (Western style toilets)
pour flush squat toilets
contaminates waterways and “receiving” waters
spreads disease especially during flooding or heavy rain
high cost of installation
high energy requirements for manufacture and maintenance of sewerage hardware
pipes
excavation
pump stations
pumps
vents and odour control
corrosion repairs
blockages
reduces local disease vectors
subject to raw sewage overflows during flooding
high cost of maintenance
contamination and eutrophication of receiving waters
nutrients are permanently lost
effluent disposal or treatment is still needed
collection system can represent more than 80% of the total cost of sewerage infrastructure
Sewage treatment
raw sewage discharge to receiving waters
spreads disease
contaminates ecosystems
pollutes receiving waters
nutrients lost to agriculture
can cause toxic algal blooms
pollutes beaches
screening only
sewage is screened to remove plastics, condoms, sanitary products and other identifiable sewage components
still spreads disease
still contaminates the environment
still wastes nutrient resources
primary treatment
open settling /oxidation ponds
minimal treatment
requires long retention times
odours are a problem
relatively low cost
flooding rain can cause environmental contamination
water birds and animals attracted to the ponds can be disease vectors and viral hosts
biogas anaerobic treatment
sometimes used to recover enough energy to run the subsequent treatment steps
gas recovered
useful source of energy
odour
sludge disposal cost
high maintenance
can require heating to work efficiently in cold areas
high capital cost
corrosion problems
effluent quality is low without further treatment
disease can be spread by effluent and sludge
Secondary treatment
activated sludge
sludge disposal
high energy required to treat sewage
nutrient contamination of receiving waters
toxic disinfection by-products due to organic matter suspended in the effluent
capital intensive
high maintenance
odours
diseases particularly virus’ still present even after chlorine disinfection
stormwater infiltration to collection system can result in raw sewage discharges during heavy rainfall
nutrient contamination and algal blooms still a problem if discharged to water systems
Advanced tertiary treatment and recycling
very expensive
high maintenance
recycle system infrastructure required
high verification cost
high risk if final effluent is not up to recycle standard
high flows during flooding events still problematic
requires preliminary biological pretreatment with all of the attendant issues listed above
screening
primary treatment
secondary treatment
disinfection
nutrient removal
very high energy required
manufacture of equipment & membranes
filtration pumping
reverse osmosis
distribution of effluent
discharge to land
Soil treatment via land application (sewerage farm)
requires land available near the city to avoid costly long distance pumping
soil infiltration process is relatively energy efficient
reoxygenation is rapid
can be located away from urban areas
nutrients can be recovered for agriculture
sunlight reduces pathogen load
odours especially if anaerobic primary pretreatment is used
wet weather storage is critical to avoid waterway contamination
animals exposed to the land application area can be disease vectors
STED/SETEP Septic tank effluent pumping or draining networks
still requires pretreatment infrastructure
septic
wet composting
secondary on site systems
pumping cost is reduced compared to sewage
for STED no pumping cost depending on lay of the land
sludge management is still required
septic pump out infrastructure is required
can be suitable for soils with poor drainage
still need to be able to store or reuse the effluent collected
effluent can be used for irrigation during dry times
VIP toilets
relatively low cost
odours
flies and insect vectors
low user acceptance
doesn’t require water for flushing
can contaminate ground water and drinking water
Landfill collection and disposal
in developed countries some sanitary wastes are disposed of to landfill
infant and adult nappies/diapers
sanitary products
tampons
pads
food wastes
paper wipes
in many Asian countries sewer systems are not designed to take toilet paper
nutrients and organic matter lost
energy intensive
high management and logistics requirement